<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for iamromeo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.iamromeo.com/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.iamromeo.com/blog</link>
	<description>I think, design, develop and photograph stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:57:43 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The value of a human being, first encounters by Iason</title>
		<link>http://www.iamromeo.com/blog/?p=249&#038;cpage=1#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Iason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iamromeo.com/blog/?p=249#comment-17</guid>
		<description>I would say that, first of all, there is an issue in comparing a human being (rather, an [e.g. friendly or amorous] relationship with a human being) to any product: The buying (or, shall we say, investment) process is different among different products, and very different in people.

Let&#039;s take as example (a), an iPod; example (b), a coat; example (c) tennis lessons (a service); and (d) an interpersonal relation.
Although the good invested to acquire all three examples differs from the one commonly invested in getting to know a person (i.e. one buys a friend or lover not with money but with time*), I would say that as far as the investment process goes, they are sorted from the most dissimilar to the most similar when compared to a friend.
In (a), one simply approaches the product and trades it for its assigned value in money.
In (b), one approaches the product, tries it to see whether it fits, then may decide whether to invest the money equivalent to actually acquire it.
In (c), which, being a service rather than a product, is most similar to a friendship or other interpersonal relationship, one has to, little by little, invest money, while getting to know the service and whether it fits him or her. The first try may be for free, but in the long run you get to choose more than once, twice or thrice whether you would like to keep investing in the service.
Similarly, in (d), one may not need to invest a lot of time or attention* to meet the person in question (if introduced by a common acquaintance), but in order to maintain a growing relation, one needs to keep investing time in the relation.

This would also raise the issue of value versus price, which is very valid so much in commercial products and services as in people. This can depend on circumstance and on the character of the person in question.
__________
* Although many &#039;goods&#039; other 
  than time can be involved in the 
  transaction of acquiring a friend 
  or lover, I will consider them all 
  equivalent to varying amounts 
  of time, for the sake of simplicity 
  (and ignoring the overused 
  equation of time=money which, 
  though logical in some respects, 
  is more far-fetched).

Then again, your point as I understood it was more about the moment of gaining interest. 
I would say that this depends heavily on the type of store you shop for friends in: I suppose there are shops where there are so many products that first appearances have to count a lot; and that in other, smaller shops, where everything is brought for display by a friend or trusted acquaintance (and products are not to be found in this overwhelming capitalist abundance that, so to speak, forces you to go for the sugars and fats since you don&#039;t have the time to get interested in the actual taste of the thing), there, one might find that packaging matters at least a little bit less.
Of course, the best advertisement of one&#039;s hidden qualities, supposing one cannot impress on first impression, comes from those that have experienced these qualities and can tell of them to the new potential buyers.
But, in an environment where not so much a common interest [or, even worse, a common wish to vaguely &#039;chill out&#039;], but more a friendly recommendation has brought about the company, one surely has more chances to tear his own unattractive packaging and communicate directly, product-to-product with no packaging in between, thus maybe finding his or her place in that company.

I maybe babble a little bit, but I hope to have made my point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say that, first of all, there is an issue in comparing a human being (rather, an [e.g. friendly or amorous] relationship with a human being) to any product: The buying (or, shall we say, investment) process is different among different products, and very different in people.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s take as example (a), an iPod; example (b), a coat; example (c) tennis lessons (a service); and (d) an interpersonal relation.<br />
Although the good invested to acquire all three examples differs from the one commonly invested in getting to know a person (i.e. one buys a friend or lover not with money but with time*), I would say that as far as the investment process goes, they are sorted from the most dissimilar to the most similar when compared to a friend.<br />
In (a), one simply approaches the product and trades it for its assigned value in money.<br />
In (b), one approaches the product, tries it to see whether it fits, then may decide whether to invest the money equivalent to actually acquire it.<br />
In (c), which, being a service rather than a product, is most similar to a friendship or other interpersonal relationship, one has to, little by little, invest money, while getting to know the service and whether it fits him or her. The first try may be for free, but in the long run you get to choose more than once, twice or thrice whether you would like to keep investing in the service.<br />
Similarly, in (d), one may not need to invest a lot of time or attention* to meet the person in question (if introduced by a common acquaintance), but in order to maintain a growing relation, one needs to keep investing time in the relation.</p>
<p>This would also raise the issue of value versus price, which is very valid so much in commercial products and services as in people. This can depend on circumstance and on the character of the person in question.<br />
__________<br />
* Although many &#8216;goods&#8217; other<br />
  than time can be involved in the<br />
  transaction of acquiring a friend<br />
  or lover, I will consider them all<br />
  equivalent to varying amounts<br />
  of time, for the sake of simplicity<br />
  (and ignoring the overused<br />
  equation of time=money which,<br />
  though logical in some respects,<br />
  is more far-fetched).</p>
<p>Then again, your point as I understood it was more about the moment of gaining interest.<br />
I would say that this depends heavily on the type of store you shop for friends in: I suppose there are shops where there are so many products that first appearances have to count a lot; and that in other, smaller shops, where everything is brought for display by a friend or trusted acquaintance (and products are not to be found in this overwhelming capitalist abundance that, so to speak, forces you to go for the sugars and fats since you don&#8217;t have the time to get interested in the actual taste of the thing), there, one might find that packaging matters at least a little bit less.<br />
Of course, the best advertisement of one&#8217;s hidden qualities, supposing one cannot impress on first impression, comes from those that have experienced these qualities and can tell of them to the new potential buyers.<br />
But, in an environment where not so much a common interest [or, even worse, a common wish to vaguely 'chill out'], but more a friendly recommendation has brought about the company, one surely has more chances to tear his own unattractive packaging and communicate directly, product-to-product with no packaging in between, thus maybe finding his or her place in that company.</p>
<p>I maybe babble a little bit, but I hope to have made my point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on To write, or not to write! by Eleni</title>
		<link>http://www.iamromeo.com/blog/?p=237&#038;cpage=1#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Eleni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 13:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iamromeo.com/blog/?p=237#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t just say &quot;don&#039;t post it&quot;.

I just believe one should first do his reserach, gather and understand which are his references before posting stuff. 

I agree with Dionysi&#039;s opinion. You should post if you know or at least believe that your post will have something to offer to someone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t just say &#8220;don&#8217;t post it&#8221;.</p>
<p>I just believe one should first do his reserach, gather and understand which are his references before posting stuff. </p>
<p>I agree with Dionysi&#8217;s opinion. You should post if you know or at least believe that your post will have something to offer to someone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on To write, or not to write! by Dimitris</title>
		<link>http://www.iamromeo.com/blog/?p=237&#038;cpage=1#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimitris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 13:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iamromeo.com/blog/?p=237#comment-13</guid>
		<description>My opinion is that if an idea is original you should present it even if you&#039;re using someone else&#039;s methods (either by accident or because you&#039;re set to). Most of contemporary work in many fields of human knowledge is highly derivative anyway. To take an existing design and to improve on it doesn&#039;t show an unimaginative mind but the exact opposite of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My opinion is that if an idea is original you should present it even if you&#8217;re using someone else&#8217;s methods (either by accident or because you&#8217;re set to). Most of contemporary work in many fields of human knowledge is highly derivative anyway. To take an existing design and to improve on it doesn&#8217;t show an unimaginative mind but the exact opposite of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on To write, or not to write! by abresas</title>
		<link>http://www.iamromeo.com/blog/?p=237&#038;cpage=1#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>abresas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 13:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iamromeo.com/blog/?p=237#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Definitely yes. There&#039;s no question here.

First of all, If some of your readers needs a menu one day, he will remember your post and use it without losing time googling. Of course, you could just post about other jquery menus, but hey! your menu may be more suitable for someone. I wouldn&#039;t recommend you to start writing your own menu, but you &#039;ve done it, and now it&#039;s time to share it.

I don&#039;t see why you shouldn&#039;t write about it. Well, it might be a bit boring and I&#039;ve-seen-this-a-hundred-times but it doesn&#039;t have to: You could talk about what other good menus exist, why your menu is different, an in-depth tutorial/explanation/study on how you did it or why aliens would love it. You are creative enough to come up with an interesting post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely yes. There&#8217;s no question here.</p>
<p>First of all, If some of your readers needs a menu one day, he will remember your post and use it without losing time googling. Of course, you could just post about other jquery menus, but hey! your menu may be more suitable for someone. I wouldn&#8217;t recommend you to start writing your own menu, but you &#8216;ve done it, and now it&#8217;s time to share it.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see why you shouldn&#8217;t write about it. Well, it might be a bit boring and I&#8217;ve-seen-this-a-hundred-times but it doesn&#8217;t have to: You could talk about what other good menus exist, why your menu is different, an in-depth tutorial/explanation/study on how you did it or why aliens would love it. You are creative enough to come up with an interesting post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on To write, or not to write! by Alina</title>
		<link>http://www.iamromeo.com/blog/?p=237&#038;cpage=1#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Alina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 12:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iamromeo.com/blog/?p=237#comment-10</guid>
		<description>You should post. First of all, you never know who will reach your posts, maybe it&#039;s a person who doesn&#039;t know how to do it. And then there are people who are interested in learning about different ways of doing the same thing, comparing etc.. If you have time, there&#039;s no harm in writing informative posts, especially if you enjoy doing it! The [mostly information related] volunteer aspect of the internet is of the things that make it a wonderful place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should post. First of all, you never know who will reach your posts, maybe it&#8217;s a person who doesn&#8217;t know how to do it. And then there are people who are interested in learning about different ways of doing the same thing, comparing etc.. If you have time, there&#8217;s no harm in writing informative posts, especially if you enjoy doing it! The [mostly information related] volunteer aspect of the internet is of the things that make it a wonderful place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on To write, or not to write! by Mel</title>
		<link>http://www.iamromeo.com/blog/?p=237&#038;cpage=1#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 12:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iamromeo.com/blog/?p=237#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Oh, a new twist to &#039;is there novelty in art&#039; debate. Yes, my opinion is that, even if you&#039;re just providing something old in a new way, it&#039;s good for you to do it. Regardless if you&#039;re offering something to the world or not. It&#039;s a free world, and an ever freer web.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, a new twist to &#8216;is there novelty in art&#8217; debate. Yes, my opinion is that, even if you&#8217;re just providing something old in a new way, it&#8217;s good for you to do it. Regardless if you&#8217;re offering something to the world or not. It&#8217;s a free world, and an ever freer web.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on To write, or not to write! by laviebohemie</title>
		<link>http://www.iamromeo.com/blog/?p=237&#038;cpage=1#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>laviebohemie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 12:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iamromeo.com/blog/?p=237#comment-8</guid>
		<description>ofcourse you post it, there&#039;s no question about it. All ideas are based on other ideas that somehow came to our knowledge, nothing is really really new. If so, it would be revolution :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ofcourse you post it, there&#8217;s no question about it. All ideas are based on other ideas that somehow came to our knowledge, nothing is really really new. If so, it would be revolution <img src='http://www.iamromeo.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on To write, or not to write! by Dionysis Zindros</title>
		<link>http://www.iamromeo.com/blog/?p=237&#038;cpage=1#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Dionysis Zindros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 12:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iamromeo.com/blog/?p=237#comment-7</guid>
		<description>It is beneficial to repost something that has already been done if you&#039;re doing something differently -- if you&#039;re explaining things differently, or if you think your code will be more understandable to J. Random Hacker wandering around the swamps of Google.

Imagine someone searching for the topic in hand: Would your webpage, as a result, help them better understand their quest and provide solutions to it? Then you should post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is beneficial to repost something that has already been done if you&#8217;re doing something differently &#8212; if you&#8217;re explaining things differently, or if you think your code will be more understandable to J. Random Hacker wandering around the swamps of Google.</p>
<p>Imagine someone searching for the topic in hand: Would your webpage, as a result, help them better understand their quest and provide solutions to it? Then you should post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
